Skip to content

Benchmark Results

HotpotQA and MathQA evaluate 10 candidates in each of two roles, giving 100 model combinations and 20,000 configuration–question outcomes per benchmark. Their tables report complete 200-question means for quality, deployment cost, and server-reported LLM latency.

GPQA Diamond and BFCL are separate single-role benchmarks with nine candidates. Their model tables report mean server LLM latency and invocation cost per complete sample; their selector comparisons use 50 random seeds. Measurement definitions and fixed data-source links accompany the benchmark sections below.

Models

The table lists the token rates used for cost accounting in the recorded experiments, in USD per million input or output tokens. These are experiment accounting rates, not a live pricing quote. The All four rows appear in both candidate sets; DeepSeek R1 and GPT-5.6 Luna are used by HotpotQA/MathQA, while Claude 3 Haiku is used by GPQA/BFCL.

Model Provider Input $/MTok Output $/MTok Benchmarks
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic $5.00 $25.00 All four
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic $1.00 $5.00 All four
Claude 3 Haiku Anthropic $0.25 $1.25 GPQA / BFCL
gpt-oss-120b OpenAI $0.15 $0.60 All four
gpt-oss-20b OpenAI $0.07 $0.30 All four
Kimi K2.5 Moonshot AI $0.60 $3.00 All four
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Qwen $0.15 $1.20 All four
Qwen3 32B Qwen $0.15 $0.60 All four
Ministral 3 8B Mistral $0.15 $0.15 All four
DeepSeek R1 DeepSeek $1.35 $5.40 HotpotQA / MathQA
GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI $0.22 $1.32 HotpotQA / MathQA

Cross-Benchmark Summary

Benchmark Roles Questions Configurations Best assignment Best mean score Full-matrix evaluation cost (USD)
GPQA Diamond 1 198 9 Claude Opus 4.6 74.75% accuracy $4.71
BFCL Multi-Turn 1 200 9 Kimi K2.5, Claude Opus 4.6, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (tied) 70.00% accuracy $84.80
HotpotQA 2 200 100 Qwen3 32B / DeepSeek R1 74.66% F1 $62.58
MathQA 2 200 100 Claude Opus 4.6 / gpt-oss-20b 97.50% accuracy $234.34

Full-matrix evaluation cost is the sum of the archived per-configuration benchmark totals. For GPQA and BFCL these totals are $4.7103 and $84.8049, respectively, displayed to cents above. The HotpotQA and MathQA assignment names are ordered by their first and second workflow roles.


GPQA and BFCL Data and Measurements

The following Model Results tables describe one complete sample: a GPQA question or a BFCL multi-turn task. The GPQA source CSV and BFCL source CSV preserve the model-level server latency means and benchmark cost totals at a fixed data revision.

  • Mean server LLM latency: sum the recorded Bedrock metrics.latencyMs values across LLM calls within each sample, convert milliseconds to seconds, then average across samples with recorded server metrics. For BFCL, the sum spans recorded LLM calls across the multi-turn task; it is not a per-call or per-turn mean. This measure excludes client processing, network transfer, tool execution, and worker-queue time. Missing server metrics are excluded rather than counted as zero. The retained BFCL records provide server totals for all 200 samples per model. GPQA uses the archived model means; its retained replay lookup does not preserve the per-sample server metrics needed to independently audit their coverage.
  • Mean cost: divide the archived per-model benchmark total by 198 GPQA questions or 200 BFCL samples. Cost accounts for LLM invocation token usage at the recorded experiment prices; it is not a provider invoice or the cost of running tools and other infrastructure. The source CSV's Cost ($) is a benchmark total, not a per-sample amount. Calculations retain the source totals at their recorded precision; per-sample means are rounded to six decimal places only for display. Full-matrix totals are summed directly from the archived totals.
  • Mean search cost: the selector tables report the total evaluation cost incurred during model selection, averaged over 50 seeds, in USD per search run. Savings are relative to exhaustive evaluation of the same benchmark matrix. This is distinct from the cost of serving one sample with the selected model.

The retained GPQA replay lookup assigns each question its model's mean cost and has no per-question token records; it cannot independently recover historical question-level cost variation. BFCL retains question-level cost and token records. These provenance limits apply to the archived GPQA/BFCL model results and replay data.


GPQA Diamond

Graduate-level science QA — 198 multiple-choice questions from the GPQA Diamond dataset. Single-agent architecture: one LLM answers directly.

Model Results

Rank Model Accuracy Mean server LLM latency (s/sample) Mean cost (USD/sample)
1 Claude Opus 4.6 74.75% 9.16 $0.012471
2 Kimi K2.5 72.73% 16.41 $0.005730
3 gpt-oss-120b 68.18% 6.46 $0.000960
4 Claude Haiku 4.5 59.60% 3.70 $0.002611
5 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B 51.01% 10.33 $0.000671
6 gpt-oss-20b 50.00% 6.21 $0.000658
7 Qwen3 32B 46.97% 1.54 $0.000370
8 Ministral 3 8B 36.87% 0.25 $0.000036
9 Claude 3 Haiku 34.85% 1.79 $0.000283

Selector Comparison

Selector Find Rate Mean Accuracy Evaluations Mean search cost (USD/run) Savings
Brute Force 100% 74.75% 1,782 $4.71 --
Arm Elimination 94% 74.10% 666 $3.57 24%
Bayesian Opt 56% 72.43% 990 $2.59 45%

Thinking Effort Ablation

Impact of thinking/reasoning budget on GPQA accuracy for Opus (adaptive effort) and Haiku 4.5 (budget_tokens). Baseline "none" rows use brute force results.

Model Effort/Budget Tokens Accuracy Cost/Sample Server Latency/Sample (s)
Opus high 83.90% $0.113 70.4
Opus medium 79.30% $0.0341 23.9
Opus none 74.75% $0.0125 9.16
Haiku 4.5 16K 71.20% $0.0192 30.6
Haiku 4.5 32K 71.20% $0.0361 57.4
Opus low 61.60% $0.00302 3.06
Haiku 4.5 5K 60.10% $0.00925 15.0
Haiku 4.5 none 59.60% $0.0026 3.70

BFCL Multi-Turn

Multi-turn function calling — 200 samples from the Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL v3). Each sample has multiple turns with tool-calling loops. Models that don't support native function calling (Qwen3 32B, Kimi K2.5, Ministral 3 8B) use a text-based prompting fallback.

Comparison with official BFCL leaderboard

Our evaluation uses a live LangGraph agent that executes tool calls against real backend state machines, whereas the official BFCL leaderboard uses static response matching. Our accuracy numbers are not directly comparable to the leaderboard — they reflect end-to-end agent performance including tool execution, state management, and multi-step reasoning.

Model Results

Rank Model Accuracy Mean server LLM latency (s/sample) Mean cost (USD/sample)
1 Kimi K2.5 70.00% 21.30 $0.019256
2 Claude Opus 4.6 70.00% 42.35 $0.300663
3 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B 70.00% 60.54 $0.009481
4 Claude Haiku 4.5 65.00% 20.90 $0.059920
5 gpt-oss-120b 58.50% 20.01 $0.005804
6 Qwen3 32B 47.00% 10.78 $0.005028
7 Claude 3 Haiku 43.50% 17.96 $0.017096
8 gpt-oss-20b 42.00% 10.03 $0.002145
9 Ministral 3 8B 34.00% 29.03 $0.004633

Selector Comparison

Selector Find Rate Mean Accuracy Evaluations Mean search cost (USD/run) Savings
Brute Force 100% 70.00% 1,800 $84.80 --
Arm Elimination 88% 69.37% 912 $74.39 12%
Bayesian Opt 44% 69.27% 1,000 $50.64 40%

HotpotQA and MathQA Data and Measurements

Each linked CSV contains 20,000 rows keyed by configuration_id and question_id, with scores, token usage, invocation cost, latency_seconds, and server_latency_ms. These are per-question workflow summaries, rather than per-call transcripts.

The links pin a specific data commit so the published tables can be reproduced.

  • Quality: HotpotQA reports mean token-level F1; MathQA reports the proportion of correct multiple-choice answers. Every configuration uses the same 200 questions, including zero-score outcomes.
  • Deployment cost: mean recorded invocation cost per question, calculated from model-specific input and output token usage. It is an accounting measure, not an amount read from a provider bill. The full-matrix costs above sum all 20,000 outcomes.
  • Server latency: each workflow/question's server_latency_ms field sums the server-reported metrics.latencyMs values of successful LLM calls. The tables divide this field by 1,000 to obtain seconds, then average over the 200 questions. This measure excludes tool execution, client processing, network transfer, and worker queue time. It is distinct from the CSV's latency_seconds field and the package's runtime workflow timer.

The tables rank configurations by full-benchmark mean quality, breaking exact ties by lower deployment cost, then lower server latency. All costs in the following configuration tables are USD per question.


HotpotQA

Multi-hop question answering — 200 questions from the HotpotQA distractor setting. A planner proposes search steps and can delegate to a solver with tool access. Ten candidates per role give 100 model combinations. Quality is mean token-level F1 over all 200 questions, displayed as a percentage.

Top 15 Combos

Rank Planner Solver Mean F1 Server latency (s/query) Cost (USD/query)
1 Qwen3 32B DeepSeek R1 74.66% 3.00 $0.004038
2 Ministral 3 8B Claude Opus 4.6 74.27% 4.97 $0.013209
3 Qwen3 32B Claude Opus 4.6 73.02% 4.26 $0.013245
4 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Claude Opus 4.6 72.10% 4.67 $0.013348
5 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B DeepSeek R1 72.00% 3.11 $0.003867
6 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B gpt-oss-120b 71.83% 3.07 $0.000639
7 Kimi K2.5 DeepSeek R1 71.25% 3.73 $0.004061
8 Ministral 3 8B DeepSeek R1 70.91% 3.41 $0.004304
9 Qwen3 32B gpt-oss-120b 70.04% 2.66 $0.000630
10 Kimi K2.5 Claude Opus 4.6 69.96% 4.49 $0.012142
11 gpt-oss-120b DeepSeek R1 69.60% 2.40 $0.002414
12 Ministral 3 8B gpt-oss-20b 68.99% 5.64 $0.000441
13 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B GPT-5.6 Luna 68.89% 13.52 $0.000330
14 Ministral 3 8B gpt-oss-120b 68.70% 3.65 $0.000615
15 Qwen3 32B GPT-5.6 Luna 68.61% 27.14 $0.000311

Bottom 15 Combos

Rank Planner Solver Mean F1 Server latency (s/query) Cost (USD/query)
86 Claude Haiku 4.5 Qwen3 32B 36.13% 2.89 $0.002297
87 Ministral 3 8B Claude Haiku 4.5 32.42% 4.14 $0.003514
88 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Claude Haiku 4.5 32.19% 3.92 $0.003614
89 Claude Opus 4.6 Kimi K2.5 31.96% 4.72 $0.010119
90 Claude Opus 4.6 Ministral 3 8B 31.96% 4.72 $0.010119
91 Claude Opus 4.6 Qwen3 32B 31.96% 4.72 $0.010119
92 Claude Opus 4.6 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B 31.96% 4.72 $0.010119
93 Claude Opus 4.6 gpt-oss-120b 31.95% 4.60 $0.010105
94 Claude Opus 4.6 gpt-oss-20b 31.88% 4.57 $0.010136
95 Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Haiku 4.5 31.77% 4.16 $0.010151
96 Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 31.71% 4.19 $0.010111
97 Claude Opus 4.6 DeepSeek R1 31.22% 2.60 $0.010142
98 Claude Opus 4.6 GPT-5.6 Luna 31.22% 2.60 $0.010142
99 Qwen3 32B Claude Haiku 4.5 26.63% 3.47 $0.003471
100 Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 26.49% 3.40 $0.003954

Role behavior matters

Claude Opus 4.6 planner combinations score 31.22–31.96% mean F1 in this workflow. The planner can terminate with a direct answer instead of delegating to the solver, so model capability alone does not determine the best role assignment. The highest-scoring assignment here uses Qwen3 32B as planner and DeepSeek R1 as solver (74.66% mean F1).

Full 100 Combo Results
Rank Planner Solver Mean F1 Server latency (s/query) Cost (USD/query)
1 Qwen3 32B DeepSeek R1 74.66% 3.00 $0.004038
2 Ministral 3 8B Claude Opus 4.6 74.27% 4.97 $0.013209
3 Qwen3 32B Claude Opus 4.6 73.02% 4.26 $0.013245
4 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Claude Opus 4.6 72.10% 4.67 $0.013348
5 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B DeepSeek R1 72.00% 3.11 $0.003867
6 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B gpt-oss-120b 71.83% 3.07 $0.000639
7 Kimi K2.5 DeepSeek R1 71.25% 3.73 $0.004061
8 Ministral 3 8B DeepSeek R1 70.91% 3.41 $0.004304
9 Qwen3 32B gpt-oss-120b 70.04% 2.66 $0.000630
10 Kimi K2.5 Claude Opus 4.6 69.96% 4.49 $0.012142
11 gpt-oss-120b DeepSeek R1 69.60% 2.40 $0.002414
12 Ministral 3 8B gpt-oss-20b 68.99% 5.64 $0.000441
13 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B GPT-5.6 Luna 68.89% 13.52 $0.000330
14 Ministral 3 8B gpt-oss-120b 68.70% 3.65 $0.000615
15 Qwen3 32B GPT-5.6 Luna 68.61% 27.14 $0.000311
16 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B gpt-oss-20b 68.37% 2.83 $0.000477
17 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Qwen3 Next 80B A3B 68.15% 2.69 $0.000570
18 Ministral 3 8B Qwen3 Next 80B A3B 67.98% 3.85 $0.000556
19 Qwen3 32B Qwen3 Next 80B A3B 67.53% 3.51 $0.000541
20 Ministral 3 8B GPT-5.6 Luna 67.48% 50.17 $0.000307
21 Kimi K2.5 GPT-5.6 Luna 66.79% 16.59 $0.001192
22 Qwen3 32B gpt-oss-20b 66.48% 2.47 $0.000447
23 Ministral 3 8B Kimi K2.5 65.42% 3.26 $0.001298
24 gpt-oss-120b Qwen3 Next 80B A3B 64.93% 4.68 $0.000483
25 Ministral 3 8B Ministral 3 8B 64.89% 3.55 $0.000453
26 Kimi K2.5 gpt-oss-120b 64.70% 4.16 $0.001465
27 gpt-oss-120b Claude Opus 4.6 64.59% 4.57 $0.008047
28 gpt-oss-120b Claude Haiku 4.5 64.11% 4.26 $0.001883
29 Kimi K2.5 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B 63.99% 4.39 $0.001485
30 Kimi K2.5 Ministral 3 8B 63.95% 6.42 $0.001412
31 Kimi K2.5 gpt-oss-20b 63.75% 6.62 $0.001344
32 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Kimi K2.5 63.69% 2.89 $0.001329
33 gpt-oss-120b GPT-5.6 Luna 63.68% 15.68 $0.000339
34 gpt-oss-120b Ministral 3 8B 63.38% 7.34 $0.000441
35 Qwen3 32B Kimi K2.5 63.36% 3.25 $0.001420
36 Kimi K2.5 Kimi K2.5 62.46% 4.55 $0.002196
37 gpt-oss-120b gpt-oss-20b 62.18% 2.66 $0.000415
38 gpt-oss-120b gpt-oss-120b 62.15% 4.59 $0.000511
39 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Ministral 3 8B 61.80% 4.25 $0.000487
40 Qwen3 32B Ministral 3 8B 61.17% 2.89 $0.000459
41 gpt-oss-120b Kimi K2.5 60.85% 4.09 $0.000891
42 gpt-oss-120b Qwen3 32B 58.80% 4.06 $0.000483
43 gpt-oss-20b DeepSeek R1 57.10% 2.22 $0.001698
44 gpt-oss-20b Claude Opus 4.6 55.86% 2.84 $0.005212
45 Ministral 3 8B Qwen3 32B 55.02% 3.63 $0.000535
46 Qwen3 32B Qwen3 32B 54.82% 2.53 $0.000541
47 Kimi K2.5 Qwen3 32B 54.73% 4.57 $0.001478
48 gpt-oss-20b Claude Haiku 4.5 54.28% 2.19 $0.001299
49 gpt-oss-20b Ministral 3 8B 54.25% 4.35 $0.000265
50 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Qwen3 32B 54.13% 2.83 $0.000570
51 gpt-oss-20b Qwen3 Next 80B A3B 53.89% 2.11 $0.000296
52 gpt-oss-20b GPT-5.6 Luna 53.81% 3.92 $0.000193
53 gpt-oss-20b gpt-oss-120b 52.17% 2.11 $0.000315
54 gpt-oss-20b Kimi K2.5 51.01% 1.96 $0.000586
55 gpt-oss-20b gpt-oss-20b 50.09% 2.12 $0.000252
56 gpt-oss-20b Qwen3 32B 49.16% 2.05 $0.000296
57 GPT-5.6 Luna DeepSeek R1 47.19% 7.89 $0.000192
58 GPT-5.6 Luna Qwen3 32B 47.17% 7.85 $0.000120
59 GPT-5.6 Luna Qwen3 Next 80B A3B 47.10% 7.85 $0.000120
60 Claude Haiku 4.5 GPT-5.6 Luna 46.73% 2.61 $0.002180
61 GPT-5.6 Luna gpt-oss-120b 46.71% 7.86 $0.000121
62 GPT-5.6 Luna Ministral 3 8B 46.71% 7.84 $0.000118
63 GPT-5.6 Luna gpt-oss-20b 46.70% 7.86 $0.000117
64 GPT-5.6 Luna Kimi K2.5 46.68% 7.88 $0.000139
65 GPT-5.6 Luna Claude Opus 4.6 46.63% 7.87 $0.000430
66 GPT-5.6 Luna Claude Haiku 4.5 46.58% 7.86 $0.000178
67 GPT-5.6 Luna GPT-5.6 Luna 46.26% 7.92 $0.000114
68 Claude Haiku 4.5 DeepSeek R1 44.49% 3.54 $0.004705
69 Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Opus 4.6 43.54% 4.06 $0.008998
70 DeepSeek R1 Claude Haiku 4.5 43.15% 3.69 $0.004293
71 DeepSeek R1 Claude Opus 4.6 43.15% 3.69 $0.004293
72 DeepSeek R1 DeepSeek R1 43.15% 3.69 $0.004293
73 DeepSeek R1 GPT-5.6 Luna 43.15% 3.69 $0.004293
74 DeepSeek R1 Kimi K2.5 43.15% 3.69 $0.004293
75 DeepSeek R1 Ministral 3 8B 43.15% 3.69 $0.004293
76 DeepSeek R1 Qwen3 32B 43.15% 3.69 $0.004293
77 DeepSeek R1 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B 43.15% 3.69 $0.004293
78 DeepSeek R1 gpt-oss-120b 43.15% 3.69 $0.004293
79 DeepSeek R1 gpt-oss-20b 43.15% 3.69 $0.004293
80 Claude Haiku 4.5 gpt-oss-20b 41.49% 3.03 $0.002263
81 Claude Haiku 4.5 gpt-oss-120b 41.20% 3.14 $0.002352
82 Claude Haiku 4.5 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B 41.17% 2.95 $0.002306
83 Claude Haiku 4.5 Ministral 3 8B 41.09% 3.75 $0.002257
84 Claude Haiku 4.5 Kimi K2.5 41.00% 6.16 $0.002716
85 Kimi K2.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 37.19% 4.23 $0.004381
86 Claude Haiku 4.5 Qwen3 32B 36.13% 2.89 $0.002297
87 Ministral 3 8B Claude Haiku 4.5 32.42% 4.14 $0.003514
88 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Claude Haiku 4.5 32.19% 3.92 $0.003614
89 Claude Opus 4.6 Kimi K2.5 31.96% 4.72 $0.010119
90 Claude Opus 4.6 Ministral 3 8B 31.96% 4.72 $0.010119
91 Claude Opus 4.6 Qwen3 32B 31.96% 4.72 $0.010119
92 Claude Opus 4.6 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B 31.96% 4.72 $0.010119
93 Claude Opus 4.6 gpt-oss-120b 31.95% 4.60 $0.010105
94 Claude Opus 4.6 gpt-oss-20b 31.88% 4.57 $0.010136
95 Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Haiku 4.5 31.77% 4.16 $0.010151
96 Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 31.71% 4.19 $0.010111
97 Claude Opus 4.6 DeepSeek R1 31.22% 2.60 $0.010142
98 Claude Opus 4.6 GPT-5.6 Luna 31.22% 2.60 $0.010142
99 Qwen3 32B Claude Haiku 4.5 26.63% 3.47 $0.003471
100 Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 26.49% 3.40 $0.003954

MathQA

Self-reflective math reasoning — 200 multiple-choice questions. An answer model solves a problem and a critic model checks the answer; rejected answers can be revised for up to three reflection iterations. Ten candidates per role give 100 model combinations. Accuracy is the fraction of correct answers over all 200 questions.

Top 15 Combos

Rank Answer model Critic model Accuracy Server latency (s/query) Cost (USD/query)
1 Claude Opus 4.6 gpt-oss-20b 97.50% 17.09 $0.042219
2 Claude Opus 4.6 Kimi K2.5 97.00% 18.39 $0.040009
3 Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 97.00% 16.43 $0.045252
4 Claude Opus 4.6 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B 97.00% 15.82 $0.047379
5 Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Haiku 4.5 97.00% 17.39 $0.050782
6 Claude Opus 4.6 Qwen3 32B 96.50% 15.25 $0.040012
7 Claude Opus 4.6 gpt-oss-120b 96.50% 16.27 $0.043768
8 Claude Opus 4.6 Ministral 3 8B 96.00% 15.91 $0.053363
9 gpt-oss-20b Claude Opus 4.6 95.00% 7.20 $0.005698
10 Claude Haiku 4.5 Qwen3 32B 94.50% 12.68 $0.012551
11 DeepSeek R1 Claude Opus 4.6 94.50% 20.17 $0.021146
12 gpt-oss-20b gpt-oss-20b 94.00% 4.23 $0.000468
13 gpt-oss-20b Ministral 3 8B 94.00% 8.51 $0.000601
14 gpt-oss-20b Kimi K2.5 94.00% 12.17 $0.001455
15 gpt-oss-120b Claude Opus 4.6 94.00% 8.94 $0.006331

Bottom 15 Combos

Rank Answer model Critic model Accuracy Server latency (s/query) Cost (USD/query)
86 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Ministral 3 8B 77.00% 38.55 $0.002727
87 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B GPT-5.6 Luna 76.50% 24.09 $0.002471
88 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B gpt-oss-120b 76.50% 34.72 $0.002606
89 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Claude Haiku 4.5 76.50% 32.33 $0.006027
90 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B DeepSeek R1 76.50% 25.45 $0.009190
91 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Qwen3 32B 76.00% 30.64 $0.002088
92 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Qwen3 Next 80B A3B 76.00% 36.44 $0.002721
93 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Kimi K2.5 75.50% 36.37 $0.003959
94 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B gpt-oss-20b 75.00% 32.70 $0.002391
95 Kimi K2.5 gpt-oss-20b 75.00% 25.00 $0.003928
96 Kimi K2.5 gpt-oss-120b 75.00% 31.74 $0.004762
97 Kimi K2.5 Kimi K2.5 74.50% 43.05 $0.006772
98 Kimi K2.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 74.00% 26.39 $0.006879
99 Kimi K2.5 Claude Opus 4.6 74.00% 28.10 $0.014059
100 Kimi K2.5 Qwen3 32B 73.00% 29.60 $0.004667
Full 100 Combo Results
Rank Answer model Critic model Accuracy Server latency (s/query) Cost (USD/query)
1 Claude Opus 4.6 gpt-oss-20b 97.50% 17.09 $0.042219
2 Claude Opus 4.6 Kimi K2.5 97.00% 18.39 $0.040009
3 Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 97.00% 16.43 $0.045252
4 Claude Opus 4.6 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B 97.00% 15.82 $0.047379
5 Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Haiku 4.5 97.00% 17.39 $0.050782
6 Claude Opus 4.6 Qwen3 32B 96.50% 15.25 $0.040012
7 Claude Opus 4.6 gpt-oss-120b 96.50% 16.27 $0.043768
8 Claude Opus 4.6 Ministral 3 8B 96.00% 15.91 $0.053363
9 gpt-oss-20b Claude Opus 4.6 95.00% 7.20 $0.005698
10 Claude Haiku 4.5 Qwen3 32B 94.50% 12.68 $0.012551
11 DeepSeek R1 Claude Opus 4.6 94.50% 20.17 $0.021146
12 gpt-oss-20b gpt-oss-20b 94.00% 4.23 $0.000468
13 gpt-oss-20b Ministral 3 8B 94.00% 8.51 $0.000601
14 gpt-oss-20b Kimi K2.5 94.00% 12.17 $0.001455
15 gpt-oss-120b Claude Opus 4.6 94.00% 8.94 $0.006331
16 Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 94.00% 14.31 $0.012960
17 DeepSeek R1 gpt-oss-120b 94.00% 21.68 $0.018156
18 DeepSeek R1 gpt-oss-20b 94.00% 21.71 $0.018169
19 DeepSeek R1 Kimi K2.5 94.00% 22.77 $0.022307
20 gpt-oss-20b gpt-oss-120b 93.50% 5.08 $0.000619
21 gpt-oss-20b Qwen3 Next 80B A3B 93.50% 9.05 $0.000823
22 gpt-oss-120b Qwen3 32B 93.50% 5.42 $0.000838
23 gpt-oss-120b Ministral 3 8B 93.50% 10.26 $0.000958
24 gpt-oss-20b Claude Haiku 4.5 93.50% 6.31 $0.002013
25 Claude Haiku 4.5 gpt-oss-20b 93.50% 12.51 $0.011006
26 Claude Haiku 4.5 Ministral 3 8B 93.50% 14.70 $0.012867
27 Claude Haiku 4.5 Kimi K2.5 93.50% 17.50 $0.012988
28 DeepSeek R1 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B 93.50% 22.86 $0.017363
29 Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Opus 4.6 93.50% 15.82 $0.018838
30 DeepSeek R1 Ministral 3 8B 93.50% 23.57 $0.020497
31 gpt-oss-20b Qwen3 32B 93.00% 4.75 $0.000535
32 gpt-oss-120b gpt-oss-20b 93.00% 6.36 $0.000892
33 GPT-5.6 Luna gpt-oss-120b 93.00% 5.84 $0.000944
34 gpt-oss-120b gpt-oss-120b 93.00% 6.84 $0.000976
35 gpt-oss-120b Qwen3 Next 80B A3B 93.00% 10.77 $0.001146
36 gpt-oss-120b Kimi K2.5 93.00% 11.84 $0.001647
37 gpt-oss-120b Claude Haiku 4.5 93.00% 7.67 $0.002369
38 GPT-5.6 Luna Claude Opus 4.6 93.00% 6.28 $0.006081
39 Claude Haiku 4.5 gpt-oss-120b 93.00% 14.65 $0.014505
40 DeepSeek R1 GPT-5.6 Luna 93.00% 28.99 $0.019476
41 DeepSeek R1 DeepSeek R1 93.00% 27.78 $0.024207
42 Claude Haiku 4.5 DeepSeek R1 93.00% 15.57 $0.035559
43 Claude Haiku 4.5 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B 93.00% 20.98 $0.039025
44 gpt-oss-120b GPT-5.6 Luna 92.50% 8.67 $0.001056
45 GPT-5.6 Luna Qwen3 Next 80B A3B 92.50% 7.94 $0.001132
46 gpt-oss-120b DeepSeek R1 92.50% 10.78 $0.006317
47 Kimi K2.5 DeepSeek R1 92.50% 18.43 $0.011867
48 Claude Opus 4.6 GPT-5.6 Luna 92.50% 33.37 $0.079804
49 GPT-5.6 Luna Kimi K2.5 92.00% 5.98 $0.001366
50 GPT-5.6 Luna Claude Haiku 4.5 92.00% 5.34 $0.002348
51 GPT-5.6 Luna DeepSeek R1 92.00% 9.33 $0.006062
52 Claude Haiku 4.5 GPT-5.6 Luna 92.00% 33.00 $0.014394
53 GPT-5.6 Luna Ministral 3 8B 91.50% 4.34 $0.000863
54 Kimi K2.5 GPT-5.6 Luna 91.50% 16.17 $0.005511
55 DeepSeek R1 Qwen3 32B 91.50% 18.81 $0.016605
56 DeepSeek R1 Claude Haiku 4.5 91.50% 22.39 $0.019250
57 GPT-5.6 Luna GPT-5.6 Luna 91.00% 3.09 $0.000592
58 GPT-5.6 Luna Qwen3 32B 91.00% 3.47 $0.000710
59 GPT-5.6 Luna gpt-oss-20b 91.00% 4.76 $0.000733
60 Claude Opus 4.6 DeepSeek R1 91.00% 21.64 $0.092879
61 gpt-oss-20b DeepSeek R1 90.00% 11.42 $0.007534
62 gpt-oss-20b GPT-5.6 Luna 89.50% 7.70 $0.000779
63 Qwen3 32B Qwen3 Next 80B A3B 88.00% 7.76 $0.001264
64 Qwen3 32B Claude Opus 4.6 87.50% 12.01 $0.017293
65 Ministral 3 8B Qwen3 Next 80B A3B 87.00% 10.09 $0.000441
66 Qwen3 32B gpt-oss-120b 87.00% 6.95 $0.002407
67 Ministral 3 8B Kimi K2.5 86.50% 15.31 $0.001048
68 Ministral 3 8B Claude Opus 4.6 86.50% 12.53 $0.008501
69 Qwen3 32B Claude Haiku 4.5 86.00% 7.29 $0.004552
70 Ministral 3 8B gpt-oss-120b 85.50% 12.06 $0.000583
71 Ministral 3 8B GPT-5.6 Luna 85.50% 16.43 $0.000649
72 Qwen3 32B Ministral 3 8B 85.50% 17.81 $0.001751
73 Ministral 3 8B Claude Haiku 4.5 85.50% 12.08 $0.002437
74 Qwen3 32B gpt-oss-20b 85.50% 6.26 $0.002462
75 Qwen3 32B Kimi K2.5 85.50% 13.09 $0.003929
76 Ministral 3 8B gpt-oss-20b 85.00% 13.30 $0.000387
77 Ministral 3 8B Qwen3 32B 85.00% 11.16 $0.000410
78 Ministral 3 8B Ministral 3 8B 85.00% 12.69 $0.000620
79 Ministral 3 8B DeepSeek R1 85.00% 25.37 $0.009215
80 Qwen3 32B Qwen3 32B 84.50% 5.79 $0.003099
81 Qwen3 32B DeepSeek R1 80.50% 12.07 $0.008997
82 Kimi K2.5 Ministral 3 8B 78.50% 39.76 $0.004889
83 Kimi K2.5 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B 78.00% 36.54 $0.005041
84 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Claude Opus 4.6 78.00% 31.01 $0.014812
85 Qwen3 32B GPT-5.6 Luna 77.50% 10.81 $0.003074
86 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Ministral 3 8B 77.00% 38.55 $0.002727
87 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B GPT-5.6 Luna 76.50% 24.09 $0.002471
88 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B gpt-oss-120b 76.50% 34.72 $0.002606
89 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Claude Haiku 4.5 76.50% 32.33 $0.006027
90 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B DeepSeek R1 76.50% 25.45 $0.009190
91 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Qwen3 32B 76.00% 30.64 $0.002088
92 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Qwen3 Next 80B A3B 76.00% 36.44 $0.002721
93 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Kimi K2.5 75.50% 36.37 $0.003959
94 Qwen3 Next 80B A3B gpt-oss-20b 75.00% 32.70 $0.002391
95 Kimi K2.5 gpt-oss-20b 75.00% 25.00 $0.003928
96 Kimi K2.5 gpt-oss-120b 75.00% 31.74 $0.004762
97 Kimi K2.5 Kimi K2.5 74.50% 43.05 $0.006772
98 Kimi K2.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 74.00% 26.39 $0.006879
99 Kimi K2.5 Claude Opus 4.6 74.00% 28.10 $0.014059
100 Kimi K2.5 Qwen3 32B 73.00% 29.60 $0.004667